Thursday, April 24, 2008

Taxation is not Stealing

Over here, FSK makes the assertion that taxation is stealing and that, in voting to authorize taxes, you and I (assuming you, the reader, haven't voted against all candidates who have authorized taxes) have conspired to steal from him. Here is my response, which I posted as a comment on his blog. It remains to be seen if he authorizes it. He authorized the comment, without comment of his own.

A logical argument is formed by taking one or more hypotheses, transforming them with the operations provided by logic, and producing a conclusion. Such an argument is sound if 1) the operations performed are valid and 2) the hypotheses are sound.

In your argument, you assumed quite a number of hypotheses - only one of which you state explicitly: "Suppose you believe you do not have the right to steal from me." More important the unstated hypothesis: "And further assume that taxation is stealing."

There seems to be some variance amongst dictionary definitions of the word "steal," but a fairly common theme is the illegality of the action, as in the entry in Wiktionary which states: "To illegally, or without the owner's permission, take possession of something by surreptitiously taking or carrying it away." Of course, "illegally" implies a legal framework, which, in the United States of America, permits the government to levy taxes upon residents of the country in order to provide its inhabitants with services. Since, moreover, the organization of our government permits the majority of its enfranchised citizens to vote on such issues, the laws are, by a perhaps circular definition, just.

If that argument is not entirely satisfying, consider an analogy. Your landlord does not steal from you when he or she comes to collect your rent. Rather, he or she receives his or her due for the services provided - namely lodging and whatever other services were specified in the contract you both signed at the commencement of the lease. Should you at some point decide that the rent is no longer acceptable, you have a simple, completely legal recourse: you can move elsewhere.

It is thus with taxes in a town, county, state, or country. If you find yourself at odds with the overwhelming majority who have voted to authorize the current system of taxation you can (in addition to lobbying for change) emigrate. That you will be hard-pressed to find a country on this planet in which there are no taxes suggests that your view of the - not illegality, clearly, but perhaps immorality? - of taxes is not universally shared.

Monday, April 14, 2008

Speedball

UVa Team members and Owen run for cover after the break.

On Sunday, we got an introduction to Speedball. It was crazy - and it was a lot of fun. Unlike woodsball, speedball is played on a field with soft, air-filled bunkers. The field is relatively small and the games are short - in the pro leagues, they're limited to some 5-7 minutes; none of our games lasted more than a couple of minutes.

A UVa team member takes aim behind a bunker

Hearing about speedball, I figured it would be sort of boring. It's not. While true that you have a big cushy bunker for protection, your lack of knowledge about how the game is progressing while you're hiding there limits the feeling of safety you have. You have to look around and keep scanning the field, so someone doesn't come up behind you.

Randy and Big Chris in a practice round against UVa

The shortness of the games also means that if (or when) you get shot out, you're not waiting a long time to play again. Which is good. 'Cause I got shot many times off the break (before I ever made it to my bunker).


It was a lot of fun, but hard on muscles I don't usually use: I'm rather sore today. All that crouching and tension....

Owen waits behind the doghouse for a good shot.James looks for a shot.

They'll play again in a couple of weeks - but I'll be out of town. Next time, perhaps.

One of Randy's teammates dives for a bunker